What this checklist covers
The Body Repair Quality Checklist is a 15-point scorecard for panel repair, welding quality, alignment, gap consistency, structural accuracy, corrosion protection, and repair method compliance. Each criterion is scored from 1 to 5 on what the auditor sees on the day, and every gap goes into an action plan with an owner and a close date.
AutoSmart tip: Body repair quality audits are most revealing at the metalwork stage — after panels are replaced and before any filler or primer is applied. A panel that is visually aligned but has an incorrect weld flange, insufficient corrosion protection in a cavity, or a section cut in the wrong position cannot be corrected after paint without complete re-work. Conduct quality holds at the metalwork stage, not only at final inspection.
The checks
Tap Yes, No or Maybe to try it: your answers stay in this page and clear when you refresh. For a detailed walkthrough, download our PDF or book a demo.
Panel repair and welding quality
- Are all panel repairs (reshaping, filling, metal finishing) carried out to a standard that produces a surface requiring minimal filler — with filler used to perfect the surface, not to correct insufficient metalwork?
- Are panel replacement welds consistent in spacing, penetration, and appearance — free from undercut, spatter, or porosity — matching the OEM's weld specification for the panel and location?
- Are weld flanges on replaced panels treated with the correct weld-through primer before assembly, then sealed after welding as specified by the OEM repair information?
- Is a weld quality check performed by the workshop team leader or quality controller after every structural weld, before the repair proceeds to the next stage?
Alignment and gap consistency
- Are panel gaps (door-to-body, bonnet-to-wing, bumper-to-body) checked against the vehicle's original specification after panel replacement, with gaps within the OEM's tolerance range?
- Is door operation (opening, closing, latching, window sealing) verified after any door, hinge, or sill repair — confirming correct function and water seal, not only visual alignment?
- Is bonnet, bootlid, and tailgate alignment checked for flush fit and consistent gap against adjacent panels, with striker and hinge positions adjusted as required?
- Is wheel alignment checked after any suspension, subframe, or steering component replacement — with an alignment report produced and retained in the repair file?
Structural repair accuracy
- Is structural measurement taken at multiple reference points using a vehicle measuring system before and after structural repair, with measurements recorded and confirmed within OEM tolerance?
- Are section replacement cut lines positioned at OEM-approved locations — confirmed from the OEM repair information — with no section cuts in prohibited zones?
- Is the structural repair method (sectioning, uni side replacement, full rail replacement) appropriate to the extent of damage — not selected for convenience or cost, but per the OEM's repair guidance for that model and impact type?
Corrosion protection and method compliance
- Is cavity wax or equivalent corrosion protection applied to all enclosed sections and weld flanges exposed during the repair, per the OEM's corrosion protection specification?
- Are seam sealers and underbody coatings reapplied to repaired areas in a pattern matching the original application — not applied as a cosmetic cover-up over inaccessible sections?
- Is the OEM repair information source used to determine corrosion protection requirements documented in the repair file — confirming the method was researched rather than assumed from experience?
- Is body repair quality reviewed at a defined post-repair inspection stage before the vehicle enters the paint process, preventing paint being applied over quality defects that then require re- work?
How to run it
How the scoring works
Before the visit, fill in the dealer or centre, the auditor, the date and the audit cycle. Then score each of the 15 checks from 1 to 5 on what you see on the day, not on what the site aims for, and add them up out of 75.
- 1Not in place
- 2Attempted
- 3Defined
- 4Managed
- 5Fully sustained
- Green60–75 · 80–100%Compliant. Keep the standard.
- Amber38–59 · 50–79%Improvement needed: a structured action plan within 30 days.
- Red0–37 · Below 50%Priority intervention, escalated to regional management.
Then close every gap
Each gap goes into the action plan tracker and moves through four stages until the auditor closes it.
- 1PendingOwner and close date set
- 2In progressWork under way, evidence gathered
- 3CompletedEvidence submitted for review
- 4ApprovedVerified and closed by the auditor
